In an extensive interview with
the US military and defense news website Defense News, IAF air operations chief
Amikam Norkin explained that the IAF would be implementing a new operational
doctrine enabling the IAF to fire on many more targets within the same amount
of time.
According to the Defense News article, the IAF has been
able to greatly improve its so-called “Sensor-to-Shooter” capabilities. In
plain English, Sensor-to-Shooter means the ability to take vast quantities of
data and information – obtained through a variety of data links and sources –
and then take advantage of this data through the use of laser-guided bombs and
precision weaponry (Note: there is a nice summary of
the components of Sensor-to-Shooter on website of defense contractor
Thales). While I would strongly recommend reading the entire Defense News
article, (particularly if you’re a military or strategic studies buff), two
sentences in the piece jumped out at me:
Under the new concept, Israel will focus on “hurting the enemy where it hurts the most,” Norkin said, referring to leadership, commanders and significant war-fighting assets.“We won’t be able to push the enemy to the point where he can no longer shoot rockets and missiles. Therefore we need to push him to the point where he doesn’t want to shoot his rockets and missiles,” the IAF officer said.
|
||
What does this mean in practice? One possibility is that the IDF is thinking about a future conflict with Hezbollah. |
It is universally acknowledged that Hezbollah now has
tens and thousands of missiles, some with enough range to strike anywhere in
Israel. Given that the IAF will only be able to take out a small number of
these missiles, the IDF believes the most critical thing it can do is strike
Hezbollah’s leadership – such as Hassan Nasrallah and his deputies – as
well as other top Hezbollah assets.
Although the Defense News article does not mention this,
one educated guess here is that the IDF hopes destroying Hezbollah’s leadership
and other key assets would throw the Lebanese group into a state of confusion.
The aim is to leave an enemy like Hezbollah leaderless, destroy its
communication capabilities, and leave its forces on the front lines thrashing
around like a chicken without a head. In military jargon, this would be
described as degrading the enemy’s “Command and Control” (C2) capabilities. In
that context, if the IAF can truly destroy 10-times the number of targets
within the same time frame, than Israel’s military leadership may hope it can
rapidly end any conflict by quickly eliminating the enemy’s C2 capabilities.
Of course, there is the following question: Does the
increase in the IAF’s destructive – even an increase by a factor of ten – allow
the IDF to win wars without a major commitment to ground combat? Ground
combat is very messy, especially against a guerrilla force ensconced in
civilian areas, but aren’t “boots on the ground” still critical to winning
the next conflict against Hezbollah or other enemies?? Based on the recent war
in Gaza, it looks like the answer is a resounding yes – and that ground forces
will still play a central role in the IDF’s military philosophy.
I suspect we’ll be seeing more details on the IAF’s plans
in the Israeli press over time.
No comments:
Post a Comment